ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Evaluation of alternative antimicrobial strategies in high-performance pigs for managing endemic Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae populations.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated pig production performance in herds with M. hyopneumoniae by replacing in-feed antimicrobials with the herbal extract carvacrol during nursery and finishing phases. A total of 324 piglets were allocated across three treatments: ATM-Free (without antimicrobial); HE (carvacrol); and ATM (antimicrobial). They were housed in the nursery from 21 to 63 days of age (doa), then transferred to finishing and slaughtered at 175 doa. Piglets were weighed and feed consumption was measured at 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, and 63 doa in the nursery and at 75, 98, 107, 128, 135, 152, 161, and 174 doa in the finishing phase. Lung macroscopic lesions were evaluated at slaughter. Body weight (BW), average daily weight gain (ADG), and mortality/removal rate at nursery end did not differ between the HE and ATM treatments. However, feed-to-gain (F/G) was slightly worse in HE compared to ATM at nursery. The HE and ATM-Free treatments did not differ in ADG and BW, but HE was better than ATM-Free in F/G at nursery. Lung lesions score tended to be higher in ATM-Free compared to the ATM treatment. However, the frequency of lungs with a low lesion score did not differ among treatments. Removing antimicrobials from feed for pig populations endemic to M. hyopneumoniae reduces production performance during nursery and finishing phases and tends to cause larger affected lung areas suggestive of pneumonia at slaughter. Carvacrol can be an alternative to antimicrobials without relevant impacts on performance, except for the removal rate in the finishing phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.