Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41946969›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2026

Neural circuits encode prior knowledge of temporal statistics.

Julius Koppen, Ilse Klinkhamer, Marit Runge, Lucas Bayones, Devika Narain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Unsupervised nonmotor learning in the human cerebellum.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julius KoppenDonders Center for Neuroscience, Donders Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-2574-2400
Ilse KlinkhamerDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marit RungeDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Lucas BayonesDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Devika NarainDonders Center for Neuroscience, Donders Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. devika.narain@donders.ru.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7249-1273

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research) Vidi-VI.193.076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain must infer the state of the external world despite the inherent uncertainty of its sensory inputs and internal processes. Under conditions of heightened uncertainty, it increasingly relies on prior knowledge, derived from accumulated experience with the regularities and statistical structures of the environment. This principle has been formalized by Bayesian inference theories, which are supported by substantial evidence from both behavioral and neuroscience studies. However, direct evidence for the existence of prior knowledge in the brain, and for the encoding of environmental statistics by neural circuits, remains limited. Here we show that cerebellar circuits learn the prior probability distribution of temporal variables during eyeblink conditioning in mice and encode these representations in Purkinje cell simple and complex spike signaling. We further demonstrate that Purkinje cells are involved in eliciting predictive motor behaviors, such as the conditioned eyeblink response, that also reflect the statistics of the experimentally imposed prior distribution of the stimulus. Computational modeling of these results indicates the juxtaposition of counteracting long-term plasticity mechanisms by which cerebellar Purkinje cells could acquire prior knowledge that is shaped by the statistics of different probability distributions. Our results suggest that the cerebellar circuitry may be uniquely poised to learn the probability of events in the world and internalize these as prior knowledge. These findings advance understanding of how neural computations could implement Bayesian inference.

Indexed as

CerebellumConditioning, EyelidLearningNerve NetPurkinje CellsAction PotentialsAnimalsBayes TheoremMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLModels, NeurologicalNeural Pathways

Identifiers

PMID41946969
PMCPMC13246449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.