ArticleScientific reports2026
Development and validation of a nomogram for overall survival in pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasm: a population-based study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the pancreas is an uncommon tumor, leading to the lack of a prognostic prediction model. This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting overall survival (OS) in SPN patients. Data from patients diagnosed with SPN between 2000 and 2018 were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and randomly split into training and validation cohorts (7:3). Independent prognostic factors for OS were identified by Cox regression analysis. A nomogram was constructed and internally validated using the concordance index (C-index), area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). External validation was performed using our institutional data from SPN patients between January 2008 and January 2026. The results showed that the total positive lymph nodes, age, surgery type, and SEER summary stage were all independent prognostic factors for OS chosen to develop a nomogram for SPN. C-indices of 0.927, 0.93, and 0.965 were found in the training, internal validation, and external verification cohorts respectively. The nomogram's discriminative ability was proved by the AUC value (> 0.7), and the calibration curve showed alignment between the nomogram's prediction and actual survival. Finally, the outcomes of DCA further demonstrated the nomogram's clinical effectiveness. In conclusion, A nomogram was built and validated to help doctors to determine the prognosis of patients with SPN and tailor treatment options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.