ArticleScientific reports2026
The prevalence of mental health disorders and stress coping strategies among forced migrants from Ukraine and Russia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mental health of Ukrainian refugees in Germany compared to other population groups - Results from the IAB-BAMF-SOEP Survey 2023.Journal of health monitoring · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In research on the mental health of migrants and refugees, the framework of pre-migration and post-migration stressors is frequently applied. The present study sought to determine which of these stressors contribute to mental health disorders among forced migrants from Ukraine and Russia. In addition, the analyses aimed to compare the prevalence of mental health disorders between these two groups and to evaluate the effectiveness of coping strategies employed. The study also aimed to broaden the understanding of the predictors of mental health outcomes among different groups of forced migrants. A cross-sectional survey was conducted using the Computer-Assisted Web Interview (CAWI) technique. Participants were recruited through purposive sampling, with invitations disseminated via social media platforms (Telegram, Facebook) targeting Ukrainians residing in Russia. The sample comprised N = 200 Ukrainian and N = 164 Russian respondents. Data collection took place in the first quarter of 2025, which corresponds to the third year of Russia’s war against Ukraine. Depression, anxiety, and stress were assessed using the PHQ-9, GAD-7, and PSS-10 scales, respectively. Multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of mental health outcomes. Ukrainian migrants exhibited significantly higher rates of anxiety, depression, and stress (45%, 56%, 20.76 ± 5.9) compared with Russian migrants (37%, 39%, 18.79 ± 2.92). Notable differences in coping strategies were also observed: Ukrainian female migrants more frequently employed emotion-focused and resignation strategies, whereas Russian migrants tended to use problem-focused strategies. Among Ukrainians, significant predictors of poorer mental health included negative attitudes from the host population, relocation during the stay, higher educational attainment, and the use of emotion-focused or avoidance coping strategies. For Russian migrants, poorer mental health was associated with lower self-rated quality of life, underemployment, negative attitudes from the host population, and emotion-focused or avoidance coping strategies. In the context of prolonged residence in a host country, post-migration stressors and dysfunctional coping strategies appear to be the primary risk factors for mental health disorders among forced migrants. Given the cross-sectional design, the findings should be interpreted as associative rather than causal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.