ArticleCommunications biology2026
Machine and Deep Learning Reveal Sequence Determinants Encoding Bivalent Histone Modifications.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bivalent histone modifications, marked by the coexistence of activating and repressive histone marks, define a distinctive chromatin state with key roles in developmental gene regulation. However, the specific sequence features that distinguish bivalent chromatin regions remain unclear. Here we show that genome-wide profiling of H3K4me3, H3K27me3, and H3K9me3 in mouse embryonic stem cells revealed that bivalent domains have higher GC content and stronger evolutionary conservation than monovalent regions. Genes marked by bivalency were enriched in developmental signaling pathways, including Hippo, MAPK, and TGF-β. Using machine learning models trained on k-mer sequence features, we accurately distinguished bivalent from monovalent regions. Feature analysis identified informative motifs such as TCTGAA and TCACAG, associated with pluripotency transcription factors including OCT4, SOX2, ESRRB, and TCFCP2l1. Deep learning models further improved predictive accuracy and uncovered motifs enriched at the boundaries of bivalent peaks, suggesting positional specificity. These findings reveal that bivalent chromatin states are encoded by distinct sequence features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.