ArticleScientific reports2026
MRR-YOLO: an instance segmentation technique for ground-based cloud images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clouds significantly affects the power output of solar energy systems, and it also decrease the life of modules in photovoltaic system and receivers in the concentrating solar power system, resulting in costs of operation and maintenance. In the present study, the MRR-YOLO model was proposed, which was based on deep learning and instance segmentation technique. The MSDA, the RCS-OSA, and the RFAConv modules were used, and their functions to the cloud segmentation were investigated. Results found that the MSDA module helped maintain the model's lightweight, the RFAConv module had a better feature extraction of the clouds. The instance segmentation method was better than semantic segmentation in clouds detection, especially for clouds of varying shapes. The PB, the RB, and the mAP50B of the MRR-YOLO model were 79.2%, 66%, and 74.7%, respectively. For the segmentation task, the PM, the RM, and the mAP50M were 79.3%, 64.8%, and 73%, respectively. The MRR-YOLO model was validated by the SWIMSEG, the CCSN, the all-sky datasets, and the real cloud images in Zhengzhou city, it had a better detection performance and applicability than other models. A heatmap comparison was also conducted, showing that the model accurately detected all features of the clouds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.