ArticleScientific reports2026
An explainable GeoAI framework for spatial assessment of wildfire susceptibility in the Upper Ravi sub-basin, Indian Himalaya.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wildfires have emerged as a significant environmental concern in the Himalayan region, particularly in the Upper Ravi sub-basin of Himachal Pradesh, India. This study aims to map wildfire susceptibility by integrating Geographic Information Systems (GIS), remote sensing data, and advanced ensemble machine learning techniques. A total of sixteen biophysical and anthropogenic conditioning factors, including topography, climatic variables, vegetation indices, and human activity indicators, were used to develop wildfire susceptibility models. Five machine learning algorithms were evaluated, including Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, and a stacking ensemble model. Among these, the stacking model demonstrated the best predictive performance with an AUC of 0.95.To enhance model interpretability and robustness, explainability, uncertainty, and sensitivity analyses were conducted on the best-performing stacking model using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis, and Sobol global sensitivity analysis. SHAP results identified temperature, soil moisture, distance to villages, and relative humidity as the most influential wildfire conditioning factors. Monte Carlo simulations (1000 iterations) yielded a mean AUC of 0.847, indicating stable model performance under input perturbations. Sobol sensitivity analysis further confirmed soil moisture and temperature as the most influential variables, with total-order sensitivity indices of 0.45 and 0.21, respectively. Spatial analysis revealed that approximately 20.75% of the study area falls within high to very high wildfire susceptibility zones, primarily associated with regions characterized by steep terrain, low soil moisture conditions, and significant anthropogenic influence. Overall, the study presents an interpretable and uncertainty-aware GeoAI framework that integrates ensemble learning with explainable artificial intelligence and sensitivity analysis, providing a reproducible approach for wildfire susceptibility assessment in complex mountainous environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.