ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2026
Modality-general sensitivity of pupil responses to regularity violations.
Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pupil dilation responses are reliable physiological markers of arousal in response to unexpected events. We investigated how these responses generalise across different sensory modalities by using transitions between regular and random sequences of visual dots and auditory tones. In Experiment 1, we investigated sequences of visual dots and found that (a) transitions from a regular sequence to a random sequence induced pupil dilations, (b) transitions from one regular sequence to another regular sequence also induced pupil dilations, and (c) transitions from a random sequence to a regular sequence did not reliably induce them. In Experiment 2, we replicated these findings, confirming their reliability and thereby generalizing the literature from the auditory to the visual modality. In Experiment 3, we directly compared pupil dilations in visual and auditory modalities. We observed strong cross-modal similarity in pupil sizes, particularly for transitions between regular and random sequences. We also decomposed the pupil size time series to approximate phasic pupil dilation events. While the patterns of dilation events were quite similar, differences between modalities in dilation size (but not in rates) occurred during transitions from one regular to another regular sequence. Overall, our findings suggest that pupil-linked arousal reflects inference of statistical structure and its violations, exhibiting substantial (albeit not perfect) similarity across modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.