Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41946830›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2026

Implementing whole genome and transcriptome sequencing for cancer patients in routine healthcare: a comprehensive guide to costing.

Christian Altbürger, Michael Menzel, Susanne Beck, Katja Lorenz, Marie-Luise Brygider, Carolin Ploeger, Andy Kahles, Markus Ball, Martina Kirchner, Fabian Schnecko and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Christian AltbürgerInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4545-2719
Michael MenzelInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4129-4741
Susanne BeckInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2652-8722
Katja LorenzInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Marie-Luise BrygiderInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Carolin PloegerInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Andy KahlesInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus BallInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2312-8360
Martina KirchnerInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Fabian SchneckoInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Andreas JungInstitute of Pathology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Frederick KlauschenInstitute of Pathology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Tobias GrobInstitute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
David HorstInstitute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4755-5743
Daniela HirschInstitute of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Matthias EvertInstitute of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Peter SchirmacherInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jan BudcziesInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6668-5327
Daniel KazdalInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8187-3281
Albrecht StenzingerInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. albrecht.stenzinger@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1001-103X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMolecular characterisation of solid tumours contributes to a precise diagnosis and can uncover a range of drug targets and biomarkers, improving patient management. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) combined with whole transcriptome sequencing (WTS) is the most comprehensive approach in molecular cancer diagnostics and is therefore becoming increasingly integrated in clinical care. A critical challenge in implementing WGS/WTS as a clinical-grade test is its high cost compared to targeted sequencing approaches, prohibiting wider use and access.

methodsTo dissect this limitation, we performed a micro-costing analysis of an established WGS/WTS workflow based on short-read sequencing technology. We categorised the costs as follows: consumables, equipment and maintenance, personnel, and data processing/storage. We considered various scenarios, including sample volumes, personnel and equipment redundancy, inflation and mean coverage.

resultsWe have developed a multidimensional costing model that identified consumable costs, particularly flow cells, as the main cost drivers. While personnel and equipment costs decreased with larger case volumes processed (scaling effects), consumable and data processing/storage costs did not change significantly.

conclusionsThus, falling prices of consumables would facilitate the broad implementation of WGS/WTS as a clinical-grade test.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingNeoplasmsTranscriptomeWhole Genome SequencingCosts and Cost AnalysisHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumans

Identifiers

PMID41946830
PMCPMC13226723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.