ArticleScientific reports2026
Multi-modal collaborative learning for facial expression recognition in e-learning platforms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, the task of recognizing facial expressions (FER) has become an important research topic in the development of intelligent educational systems. However, facial expressions are highly dynamic and exhibit substantial variability, which makes accurate recognition difficult. To address this challenge, we introduce a novel multi-modal Collaborative Learning (MaCLe) approach based on the CLIP model for FER applications in online learning scenarios. The implementation of collaborative prompt learning enhances generalization and dynamics. The effectiveness of the proposed model is validated on three widely used benchmarks, including RAF-DB, FER2013 and AffectNet. MaCLe achieves recognition accuracies of 95.45, 80.37 and 77.66% on these datasets, respectively. Ablation studies have demonstrated that an optimal depth of J = 7 and prompt length of 2–4 tokens enable this model to effectively balance accuracy and generalization. Furthermore, even with the integration of multi-modal prompt generation, MaCLe increases FLOPs by only approximately 0.1% in comparison to CoOp and Co-CoOp. Meanwhile, it demonstrates faster convergence, achieving results in 5 epochs compared to 10, and exhibits a lower parameter overhead with only a 2.85% increase compared to CLIP. The results indicate that MaCLe significantly enhances recognition accuracy and improves training efficiency and scalability within e-learning platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.