ArticleScientific reports2026
Tunable dual-band THz metamaterial absorber with regression-learning-enabled numerical redesign.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Terahertz (THz) metamaterial absorbers have garnered considerable interest for applications in sensing, detection, and stealth technologies due to their capacity to achieve engineered absorption at subwavelength scales. This study introduces a high-performance THz metamaterial absorber featuring integrated circular split-ring resonators patterned in copper over a lead glass substrate. The design achieves dual strong absorption peaks at approximately 1.44 THz and 4.24 THz, each with absorption amplitudes nearing 90%. To explore the influence of geometric parameters on absorption characteristics and facilitate predictive modeling, full-wave electromagnetic simulations were performed by systematically varying key design variables. The resulting dataset comprises geometric parameters as input features and corresponding resonant frequencies and absorption amplitudes as target outputs. Two machine learning strategies were employed: forward design, predicting spectral response from geometry, and inverse design, estimating geometry from desired frequency peaks. Multiple linear and tree based regression models, including linear, lasso, random forest, decision trees, gradient boosting models were trained and evaluated using standard error metrics such as RMSE, MAE, and [Formula: see text] etc. A physics-informed confirmation step was carried out by re-simulating specific regression-predicted designs in a full-wave solver and comparing the resulting resonance frequencies and absorption levels with the intended targets, producing low percentage errors. Because the inverse design approach allows for the immediate retrieval of geometry corresponding to user-specified resonance frequencies and absorption amplitudes, facilitating quick spectrum-to-structure design, this validation further illustrates the tunability of the suggested absorber. All things considered, the suggested data-driven methodology reduces dependency on computationally costly repetitive simulations by facilitating effective optimization and quick prototyping of THz absorbers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.