Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41946778›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Assessing the impact of phage therapy on growth performance, microbiome and phage specific immune response in chickens.

I Nazir, D Perez, S J R Vargas, S Ur Rehman, D Arora, M Chandra, J Thimmapuram, P Ebner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

I NazirDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, 270 S. Russell St, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
D PerezSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
S J R VargasDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, 270 S. Russell St, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
S Ur RehmanDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, 270 S. Russell St, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
D AroraBioinformatics Core, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
M ChandraBioinformatics Core, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
J ThimmapuramBioinformatics Core, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
P EbnerDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, 270 S. Russell St, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA. pebner@purdue.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteriophages could be an effective alternative to antibiotics in preventing or controlling disease outbreaks in the poultry industry. This study evaluated the effects of Salmonella Gallinarum and Avian Pathogenic E. coli (APEC) phage treatments, previously shown to significantly reduce targeted bacteria in challenged chickens, on chicken growth performance, immune response, and gut microbiome. To measure the impact of phage treatment on growth and immune response, 7-day old (d) chickens were fed diets supplemented with Salmonella (1.0–2.0 × 108 PFU/mL) or APEC (107 PFU/mL) phages at 1mL/kg of feed. Growth parameters including average daily gain, average weight gain, average daily feed intake, and feed conversion ratio were calculated. Blood samples were collected at d21, d28, and d35 to detect antiphage antibodies (IgM, IgG, and IgA). Chickens receiving either Salmonella Gallinarum or APEC phages showed significantly higher ADG and AWG (p ≤ 0.05) compared to untreated controls, with no significant differences in detection of phage antibodies across groups. For microbiome analysis, chickens were challenged with either APEC or Salmonella Gallinarum and administered phages via gavage. Cecal contents were collected before and after phage treatments and microbial communities were characterized by 16 S rRNA sequencing. Differential abundance analysis (DESeq2, edgeR) revealed increased levels of beneficial taxa including Lachnospiraceae, Actualibacteriaceae, and Ruminococcaceae in birds treated with Salmonella phages, and Butyricoccaceae and Lachnospiraceae in APEC phage-treated birds (q ≤ 0.05). These results indicate phage treatment may enhance growth performance and promote a favorable gut microbial profile without inducing measurable B-cell mediated antibody responses, supporting their potential as antibiotic alternatives in poultry production.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesChickensGastrointestinal MicrobiomePhage TherapyPoultry DiseasesAnimalsAntibodies, ViralEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsSalmonellaAntibodies, ViralGrowthImmunityMicrobiomePhage therapyPoultry

Identifiers

PMID41946778
PMCPMC13219450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.