ArticleScientific reports2026
Deep learning-based differential diagnosis of major depression and bipolar disorder using microglia-cellular sensors and patient-derived small extracellular vesicles.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reconceptualizing bipolar disorder through an integrative biological lens: synthesis, convergence, and emerging directions.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD) relies on symptom-based evaluations. Both MDD as well as BD present episodes of depressed mood, often leading to misdiagnosis and treatment delays. Our study presents a novel deep learning–based diagnostic approach that employs microglial cells as biosensors to identify disease-specific image features induced by patient-derived plasma small extracellular vesicles (sEVs), enabling differentiation among MDD, BD, and control (CTRL) groups. Microglial morphological changes in response to plasma sEVs were captured using fluorescence microscopy. Individual cell images were grouped into structured M×M arrays and processed through a DenseNet121 convolutional neural network (CNN). To enhance classification robustness, P image arrays per subject were generated using random cell image permutations and affine transformations. Final diagnoses were assigned through weighted voting across all arrays. Model performance was assessed using repeated subject-disjoint random splits. The CNN-based image analysis framework accurately distinguished between MDD, BD, and CTRL subjects. The best model configuration correctly classified 44 out of 45 individuals across the five cross-validations. By combining deep learning and microglial cell-based biosensing, our results support the proof-of-concept for building a novel diagnostic platform for the differential diagnosis between MDD and BD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.