Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41946769›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Hybrid vision transformer framework for congenital heart disease diagnosis.

Khalil Khan, Din Irfanud, Rehan Ullah Khan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Khalil KhanDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computer, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.
Din IrfanudDepartment of Computer Science, New Uzbekistan University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
Rehan Ullah KhanDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computer, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia. re.khan@qu.edu.sa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Congenital heart disease is one of the most common birth defects and has been a source of significant morbidity and mortality among infants. Early diagnosis allows for early intervention and better patient outcomes. Traditional methods are effective yet have limitations such as high costs, dependency on expert knowledge, and noise. Recent developments in deep learning showcase the potential to address these limitations and automate diagnosis with high accuracies. This work proposes the use of a hybrid vision transformer (H_ViTs) model for the diagnosis of congenital heart disease based on heart sounds. The proposed vision transformer-based architecture leverages both local feature extraction with convolutional neural networks and global pattern modeling by vision transformer. Thus, the model is able to capture local dependencies with convolutional neural networks and global dependencies with vision transformers in heart sounds’ spectrogram representations. This study utilized a recently released open-source ZCHSound dataset of children’s pediatric heart sound recordings. To evaluate this model, we use accuracy, precision, recall, F-1 measure, and the confusion matrix as evaluation measures. Our proposed model obtained better results as compared to previously reported results on the same dataset. However, we notice comparatively poor results for multi-class classification, particularly for classes with limited data. In summary, the proposed hybrid model effectively detects congenital heart disease, though additional efforts are needed to improve robustness against class imbalance and noise.

Indexed as

Heart Defects, CongenitalHeart SoundsAlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksDeep LearningHumansComputer visionDeep learningHealth informaticsVision transformer

Identifiers

PMID41946769
PMCPMC13223271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.