Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41946758›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Predicting methane adsorption in coal and shale with white-box and black-box machine learning models.

Amir Hossein Sheikhshoaei, Fahimeh Hadavimoghaddam, Meftah Ali Abuswer, Ahmad Mohaddespour, Abdolhossein Hemmati-Sarapardeh, Saeid Atashrouz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amir Hossein SheikhshoaeiDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.
Fahimeh HadavimoghaddamInstitute of Unconventional Oil & Gas, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing, 163318, Heilongjiang, China.
Meftah Ali AbuswerCollege of Engineering and Technology, American University of the Middle East, Egaila 54200, Kuwait.
Ahmad MohaddespourDepartment of Chemical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC, H3A 0C5, Canada. ahmad.mohaddespour@mail.mcgill.ca.
Abdolhossein Hemmati-SarapardehDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran. hemmati@uk.ac.ir.
Saeid AtashrouzDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), Tehran, Iran. saeid_atashrouz@aut.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of methane (CH4) adsorption in coal and shale formations is essential for optimizing gas extraction, enhancing storage efficiency, mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, and ensuring safe mining and unconventional reservoir development. In this study, the most comprehensive dataset reported to date was compiled to model CH4 adsorption in coal and shale systems, using pressure (P), moisture content (M), and total organic carbon (TOC) as inputs for coal, and temperature (T), moisture content (M), and TOC for shale. To simultaneously achieve high predictive accuracy and physical interpretability, three transparent white-box models gene expression programming (GEP), group method of data handling (GMDH), and genetic programming (GP) and three advanced black-box models Gaussian process regression (GPR), categorical boosting (CatBoost), and light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) were developed and systematically evaluated. The white-box models successfully produced explicit, closed-form mathematical correlations that directly link CH4 adsorption to key controlling parameters, providing transparent, physically interpretable tools that can be readily applied without specialized software. In parallel, the black-box models were employed to benchmark predictive performance, with CatBoost achieving the best overall accuracy, yielding mean squared errors (MSE) of 0.008 and 0.004 and coefficients of determination (R2) of 0.924 and 0.997 for coal and shale, respectively. Model interpretability was further enhanced using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), which consistently identified TOC as the dominant factor governing CH4 adsorption in both systems, while leverage-based outlier analysis confirmed the robustness of the optimal models, with more than 99% of coal data and over 95% of shale data falling within the applicability domain. Notably, this work represents the first application of GEP, GMDH, and GP to derive transparent, user-friendly analytical expressions for CH4 adsorption in coal, offering a practical and interpretable alternative to purely black-box machine-learning approaches.

Indexed as

AdsorptionCoalMachine learningMethaneShaleWhite-box modeling

Identifiers

PMID41946758
PMCPMC13223194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.