Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41946753›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Anatomical characterization and visualization of the left dominant inferior mesenteric ganglionated plexus for nerve sparing colorectal surgery.

Miki Yaguchi, Tomokazu Kawashima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Miki YaguchiDepartment of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Toho University, 5-21-16 Omori-Nishi, Ota-Ku, Tokyo, 143-8540, Japan.
Tomokazu KawashimaDepartment of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Toho University, 5-21-16 Omori-Nishi, Ota-Ku, Tokyo, 143-8540, Japan. tomokazu.kawashima@med.toho-u.ac.jp.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 23K11939
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current Japanese colorectal surgical guideline excludes preservation of the inferior mesenteric plexus (IMP) from the category "preservation of all autonomic nerves (AN4)." However, clinical and experimental evidence indicates that the IMP surrounding the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) is essential for maintaining postoperative bowel, urinary, and sexual function. In clinical practice, the inferior mesenteric ganglia (IMGs) within the IMP are frequently overlooked because they are small, inconspicuous, and difficult to identify during colorectal surgery. To clarify their surgical relevance, we analyzed the anatomy of the IMP and IMGs using physical and virtual dissection of 17 formalin-fixed human cadavers. Left-dominant IMGs and one to four ganglion clusters were consistently identified on IMA's left side. Importantly, the location and size of the IMGs showed significant correlations with the branching patterns of the IMA. These findings support the concept of a "left-dominant inferior mesenteric ganglionated plexus," which is rarely visible in standard anterior or right-oblique laparoscopic views. From a surgical perspective, our results indicate that preoperative assessment of IMA branching patterns may allow prediction of the size and extent of the IMGs, thereby facilitating nerve-sparing colorectal surgery. When identification is challenging, intraoperative confirmation using lymphatic or nerve markers may further improve preservation of autonomic function.

Indexed as

Colorectal Surgical ProceduresMesenteric Artery, InferiorAgedAged, 80 and overCadaverFemaleHumansMaleOrgan Sparing TreatmentsClinical anatomyColorectal surgeryInferior mesenteric ganglionInferior mesenteric ganglionated plexusInferior mesenteric plexus

Identifiers

PMID41946753
PMCPMC13057216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.