ArticleScientific data2026
A finely annotated dataset for the automated acoustic identification of European Orthoptera and Cicadidae.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A finely annotated dataset for the automated acoustic identification of European Orthoptera and Cicadidae.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mounting evidence points to widespread declines in insect abundance and diversity across European terrestrial ecosystems, highlighting an urgent need for effective large-scale monitoring methods. Passive acoustic monitoring enables the monitoring of sound-producing insects at an unprecedented temporal and spatial scale by remotely capturing sounds such as orthopteran stridulations and cicada timbalizations. However, current automated recognition tools for European insect sounds remain limited, and developing algorithms capable of reliably identifying diverse species requires large, ecologically heterogeneous acoustic datasets. Here we present a dataset of 11,224 recordings covering 193 orthopteran and 24 cicada species from North, Central, and temperate Western Europe. It combines coarsely labeled recordings, for which we can only infer the presence, at some point, of their target species (weak labeling), with finely annotated recordings that specify the time and frequency range of each insect sound (strong labeling). This dataset complements existing online resources and supports the advancement of automated acoustic classification for orthopterans and cicadas, aiding biodiversity monitoring efforts across Europe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.