ArticleNature communications2026
Pushing the limits of fluorescence imaging with a restoration neural network aggregating large-view statistics.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning-enhanced single-shot triorganelle STED-FLIM imaging of lipid dynamics in living cells.Science advances · 2026Article
- Pushing the limits of fluorescence imaging with a restoration neural network aggregating large-view statistics.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning has demonstrated remarkable success in augmenting fluorescence imaging under photon-limited conditions. However, existing restoration networks are typically devised for training with augmented patches far smaller than the full-view raw data, an overlooked aspect that compromises fidelity and noise-resistance due to the loss of global statistics. To address this limitation, we propose a large-patch network (LargePNet), which synergizes the large effective receptive field provided by shallow ultra-large-kernel convolutions and the nonlinear representation capabilities of deep networks through scale separation. It effectively and efficiently leverages large-view global information for restoration. Directly trained with large-view images, LargePNet shows contrasting advantages over state-of-the-art small-patch networks, with 0.5-2 dB higher peak signal-to-noise ratio across eight representative restoration tasks, involving implementations for single-image, video, and volumetric fluorescence data. For full-view processing, LargePNet generally holds around 4-fold and 20-fold higher computational efficiency compared to advanced convolution-based and Transformer-based networks, respectively. The assistance of LargePNet helps achieve 30-hour-long fluorescence imaging to monitor cytoskeleton dynamics, and hour-long tri-color super-resolution imaging to investigate organelle interaction, showcasing its advancement in live-cell imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.