ArticleOccupational and environmental medicine2026
Inequalities in NHS staff support among those from ethnic minority and migrant groups during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, National Health Service staff support services were implemented to promote healthcare workers' (HCWs) well-being, alongside informal support from colleagues and managers. Certain groups may be less likely to access support, including HCWs from ethnic minority and migrant groups. These HCWs are more likely to experience discrimination and abuse at work, which may also erode access to positive and protective resources. Therefore, this study examined variation in formal support programme use and perceptions of support from managers and colleagues by ethnicity and migration status.
methodsThis study analysed survey data from 9769 HCWs in England who completed the baseline survey (launched April 2020) and the 6-month follow-up using descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression.
resultsAt 6 months, 51% of participants met the threshold for probable common mental disorder. HCWs from White Other (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) 0.79; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.99) and Asian ethnic groups (AOR 0.65; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.74) were less likely to feel supported by their colleagues than White British HCWs. Similarly, those born outside of the UK and European Union were less likely to feel supported by their colleagues than UK-born HCWs (AOR 0.70; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.94). No variations in support programme use or manager support were found across ethnicity or migration status.
conclusionsThe study suggests equitable formal support but identified critical disparities in perceived support from colleagues for HCWs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Improving workplace well-being should address the underlying social and structural factors that influence peer support and belonging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.