Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41946563›Full record

ArticleOccupational and environmental medicine2026

Inequalities in NHS staff support among those from ethnic minority and migrant groups during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Bethany Croak, Danielle Lamb, Sharon A M Stevelink, Rupa Bhundia, Juliana Onwumere, Brendan Dempsey, Pamela Almeida-Meza, Zoe Chui, Neil Greenberg, Rosalind Raine and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Bethany CroakDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, UK bethany.croak@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6486-8154
Danielle LambDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1526-9793
Sharon A M StevelinkDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7655-7986
Rupa BhundiaDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Juliana OnwumereDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Brendan DempseyDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7659-7398
Pamela Almeida-MezaDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Zoe ChuiDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Neil GreenbergKing's Centre for Military Health Research, King's College London, London, UK.
Rosalind RaineDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Charlotte WoodheadDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Stephani L HatchDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Rebecca RheadDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5863-604X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, National Health Service staff support services were implemented to promote healthcare workers' (HCWs) well-being, alongside informal support from colleagues and managers. Certain groups may be less likely to access support, including HCWs from ethnic minority and migrant groups. These HCWs are more likely to experience discrimination and abuse at work, which may also erode access to positive and protective resources. Therefore, this study examined variation in formal support programme use and perceptions of support from managers and colleagues by ethnicity and migration status.

methodsThis study analysed survey data from 9769 HCWs in England who completed the baseline survey (launched April 2020) and the 6-month follow-up using descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression.

resultsAt 6 months, 51% of participants met the threshold for probable common mental disorder. HCWs from White Other (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) 0.79; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.99) and Asian ethnic groups (AOR 0.65; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.74) were less likely to feel supported by their colleagues than White British HCWs. Similarly, those born outside of the UK and European Union were less likely to feel supported by their colleagues than UK-born HCWs (AOR 0.70; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.94). No variations in support programme use or manager support were found across ethnicity or migration status.

conclusionsThe study suggests equitable formal support but identified critical disparities in perceived support from colleagues for HCWs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Improving workplace well-being should address the underlying social and structural factors that influence peer support and belonging.

Indexed as

COVID-19EthnicityHealth PersonnelMinority GroupsSocial SupportTransients and MigrantsAdultEnglandFemaleFrontline WorkersHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2State MedicineCOVID-19Health PersonnelMental HealthOccupational Health

Identifiers

PMID41946563
PMCPMC13151436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.