Observational studyBMJ open2026
Post-progression treatment patterns in systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease-associated interstitial lung disease: insights from a US retrospective, observational study.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePatients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD) are at high risk of developing interstitial lung disease (ILD). We sought to gain insight into the pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments being used by patients with SARD-associated ILD (SARD-ILD) following ILD progression.
designThis was a retrospective, observational cohort study.
settingOptum Clinformatics Data Mart administrative medical and pharmacy claims database in the USA.
participantsPatients with SARD-ILD who had an incident ILD diagnosis and progression between January 2018 and March 2023. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Treatment patterns and healthcare services utiliation were descriptively summarised for baseline and follow-up periods.
resultsWe identified 6431 patients with SARD-ILD and evidence of ILD progression (mean age, 71.2 years; 75.3% female; 68.9% white). The mean (SD) time between the initial SARD-ILD diagnosis and the onset of ILD progression (index date) was 104 (201) days. On average, patients were followed for 936 (467) days.Oral corticosteroids were the most common treatment post-progression (69.5%), followed by non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (non-biologic DMARDs) (41.6%), biologic DMARDs (15.5%) and immunomodulators (15.4%). Antifibrotics were received by 3.5% of patients. Supplemental oxygen was the most frequent non-pharmacological treatment (48.9%). For the baseline period, 53.0% and 42.1% of patients used inpatient and emergency department services, respectively. During the follow-up, 69.7% and 62.8%, respectively, used these services.
conclusionThe high use of corticosteroids and limited use of DMARDs and antifibrotics post-progression in this descriptive study implies a significant gap between current practice and optimal management of patients with SARD-ILD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.