Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41946541›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2026

Transition of obesity in India, 2006-2021: a state-wise investigation from an equity perspective.

Jagyenswar Rath, Dayeeta Bera, Lucky Singh, Jyoti Ghosal, Sanghamitra Pati, Ambarish Dutta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jagyenswar RathIndian Institute of Public Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Dayeeta BeraSt. Xavier's College (Autonomous), Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Lucky SinghIndian Council of Medical Research Headquarters, New Delhi, India.
Jyoti GhosalIndian Institute of Public Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India jyotikumari361@gmail.com drsanghamitra12@gmail.com ambarish.dutta@iiphb.org.
Sanghamitra PatiIndian Council of Medical Research Headquarters, New Delhi, India jyotikumari361@gmail.com drsanghamitra12@gmail.com ambarish.dutta@iiphb.org.
Ambarish DuttaIndian Institute of Public Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India jyotikumari361@gmail.com drsanghamitra12@gmail.com ambarish.dutta@iiphb.org.ORCID 0000-0002-4019-7472

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionObesity and its downstream non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are the greatest health challenges of the 21st century, even in low-income and middle-income countries such as India. As traditional diseases of poverty wane, obesity and NCD burden rise. A crucial lens for understanding this transition is nation/state-wise 'economic gradient' of obesity. Therefore, we aimed to study the socioeconomic gradient of obesity and its changes (2006-2021) across India's major states vis-à-vis their varying prosperity from an equitable policy perspective.

methodsWe analysed data from non-pregnant women aged 15-49 years from National Family Health Surveys (NFHS-3 in 2006 and NFHS-5 in 2021), excluding the North-Eastern states and Union Territories. Obesity was defined as body mass index ≥25 kg/m². State-wise economic gradient was quantified using Slope Index of Inequality (SII) based on state-level wealth quintiles, assessed using gross state domestic product (GSDP). We examined associations between GSDP and both obesity prevalence and SII in both time periods.

resultsObesity prevalence increased in all states as well as nationally between 2006 and 2021 (12.3% in NFHS 3 to 23.6% in NFHS 5), but the economic gradient neither flattened nor reversed. The association between GSDP and obesity prevalence remained positive. However, the relationship between GSDP and SII (r=0.69, p=0.001 in 2006 to r=0.05, p=0.8 in 2021) weakened over time in wealthier states and steepened in poorer ones.

conclusionsDespite its ubiquitous growth, obesity was (2006) and remains (2021) concentrated among the rich in every state, though states are at varying stages of obesity transition. While none have experienced reversal of the economic gradient, green shoots of reversal are evident in affluent states through weakening of their economic gradients, while gradients intensified in poorer ones. These findings underscore the need for nuanced, state-specific strategies to ensure equitable distribution of healthcare resources to address rising obesity and NCD epidemic, without neglecting the unfinished agenda of communicable diseases.

Indexed as

ObesityAdolescentAdultFemaleHealth SurveysHumansIndiaMiddle AgedPrevalenceSocioeconomic Disparities in HealthSocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultCardiovascular diseaseEpidemiologyHealth policyIndiaPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID41946541
PMCPMC13064181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.