ArticleEndoscopy2026
Prevalence and characteristics of sessile serrated lesions with dysplasia in Dutch fecal immunochemical test-positive screenees.
Article in Endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anatomical Distribution and Prevalence of Dysplasia in Sessile Serrated Lesions: A Cohort Study Over Seven Years.Gastro hep advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) with dysplasia (SSLDs) are considered high-risk polyps. We aimed to provide robust epidemiologic data on SSLDs over time in screening individuals with positive fecal immunochemical tests (FITs). Methods: All colonoscopy and pathology data of FIT-positive screenees in the Dutch colorectal cancer screening program (2014-2023) were analyzed. Prevalence of SSLs and SSLDs was calculated, along with number needed to scope (NNS). Dysplasia rate within SSLs was calculated over time. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the influence of age and sex on SSLD prevalence, and assessed patient and polyp characteristics associated with dysplasia at polyp level. Results: Among 516 193 FIT-positive screenees, 1 033 298 polyps were removed, including 76 771 SSLs, of which 7010 (9.1%) exhibited dysplasia. Overall prevalence was 9.7% (95%CI 9.6-9.8) for SSLs and 1.1% (95%CI 1.1-1.1) for SSLDs. NNS to detect one SSL decreased over time, from 13 (2014-2018) to 9 (2019-2023), while NNS for SSLD remained stable at 90. The proportion of SSLDs declined from 17.5% in 2014 to 6.6% in 2023. Increasing age was associated with a higher SSLD prevalence (odds ratio per year 1.03; 95%CI 1.03-1.04) and dysplasia was more frequent in larger polyps (P < 0.001); however, 64.4% of SSLDs were <10 mm in size. Conclusions: This study showed a 1.1% prevalence of SSLD in FIT-positive screenees, offering valuable reference data. The finding that most SSLDs (64%) were small underscores the need to carefully assess small serrated polyps for dysplasia to ensure appropriate resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.