Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41946464›Full record

ArticlePsychotherapie, Psychosomatik, medizinische Psychologie2026

[The role of defense mechanisms in conflict and structure in the operationalized psychodynamic diagnosis].

Larissa Vierl, Cord Benecke, Miriam Henkel, QVA-Arbeitsgruppe, Anne-Sophie Metz, Hadi Safiri, Emerenz Fuchs, Bastian Burkert, Matthias Volz

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, medizinische Psychologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Larissa VierlInstitut für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany.
Cord BeneckeInstitut für Psychologie, Universität Kassel, Kassel, Germany.
Miriam HenkelInstitut für Psychologie, Universität Kassel, Kassel, Germany.
QVA-Arbeitsgruppe
Anne-Sophie MetzInstitut für Psychoanalyse Frankfurt e.V, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Hadi SafiriPsychoanalyse im Zentrum, Hannover, Germany.
Emerenz FuchsInstitut für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany.
Bastian BurkertInstitut für Psychologie, Universität Kassel, Kassel, Germany.
Matthias VolzInstitut für Psychologie, Universität Kassel, Kassel, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theoretical Background: Defense mechanisms are considered central (unconscious) processes of affect and conflict regulation in psychodynamic theory. Empirical findings on their role in relation to structure and conflicts remain limited. The aim of the present study was to examine the associations between defense styles (adaptive, neurotic, maladaptive), structural impairments, conflict modes (active vs. passive), and depressive symptoms. Method: A large clinical sample (N=2480) was investigated. Defense was assessed with the defense style questionnaire (DSQ-40), structure with the short version of the OPD structure questionnaire (OPD-SQS), conflicts with the short version of the OPD conflict questionnaire (OPD-KF36) and depressive symptoms with the respective subscale of the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9). Correlations, partial correlations, and hierarchical multiple linear regression models were conducted. Results: Lower levels of defense maturity were associated with greater structural impairment and higher depressive symptoms. Passive conflict modes were mostly related to neurotic and maladaptive defense, while active modes were also linked to adaptive defense. These effects remained robust after controlling for depressive symptoms. Structure and conflicts emerged as independent predictors of defense, yet conflicts were found to be more predictive for adaptive and neurotic defense mechanisms compared to structure. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate that defense mechanisms play a crucial for both structure and conflicts.

Indexed as

Conflict, PsychologicalDefense MechanismsAdultDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41946464
PMCPMC13275157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.