ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2026
Bacterial Resilience and Vulnerability to Neonicotinoid Seed Treatments in Soil: Short-Term Community Responses.
Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We explored the short-term impacts of three neonicotinoids (imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, and clothianidin) on soil bacterial community composition and diversity in wheat-planted microcosms. Neonicotinoids were applied as seed treatments, and soil samples were collected over 10 days. Overall alpha diversity metrics showed no significant treatment- or time-dependent shifts; however, post hoc analyses revealed transient, treatment-specific responses at individual sampling time points. Thiamethoxam and clothianidin significantly increased diversity and evenness at early time points, while imidacloprid reduced diversity by Day 10. Clothianidin was also associated with a short-term increase in estimated species richness. Actinobacteriota and Proteobacteria dominated across treatments, with Firmicutes increasing and Bacteroidota declining with time. The minor phylum Methylomirabilota exhibited a significant treatment effect. Sampling day and day-treatment interaction significantly influenced community structure. Mesorhizobium enriched under all neonicotinoids. Imidacloprid enhanced Massilia and suppressed Solirubrobacterales and Chloroflexia. Thiamethoxam enriched Gaiella, Solirubrobacter, and Massilia but suppressed Nitrospira. Clothianidin enriched Solirubrobacter and Lysobacter but suppressed Methyloceanibacter and Nitrospira. Haliangiaceae were positively correlated with sampling days, while Flavobacteriaceae and Microscillaceae were negatively correlated. Yersiniaceae and Solirubrobacteraceae were negatively correlated with imidacloprid and Mycobacteriaceae with thiamethoxam. These findings highlight the need for longer-term and functional investigations into neonicotinoid impacts on soil microbial communities and ecosystem health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.