Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41945928›Full record

ReviewJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2026

Divergent Mechanisms of Cranial Suture Ossification in Normal Development and Pathologic Fusion.

Anvith Reddy, Sarah Qaddo, Penny Li, Barite Gautama, Erin Abbott, Yomna Dean, Anna Means, Michael Golinko, Christopher Bonfield, Wesley Thayer and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anvith ReddyVanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6271-1543
Sarah QaddoVanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Penny LiVanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Barite GautamaDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Erin AbbottDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Yomna DeanDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Anna MeansDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Michael GolinkoDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Christopher BonfieldDepartment of Neurosurgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Wesley ThayerDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Galen PerdikisDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Matthew PontellDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2329-9899

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cranial sutures are dynamic growth sites that balance bone growth with mesenchymal patency to accommodate cranial expansion during development. While intramembranous ossification has traditionally been considered the default mechanism of suture fusion, accumulating evidence demonstrates that endochondral pathways might also play a significant role under both physiological and pathological conditions. In this review, we contrast normal developmental ossification processes with premature fusion in craniosynostosis, integrating histological, molecular, and imaging data. We highlight the context-dependent nature of cranial suture biology, influenced by embryonic origin, local signalling gradients, and genetic perturbations. Recognizing divergent ossification mechanisms reframes our understanding of both normal and premature suture fusion and has clinical implications for mechanism-specific therapeutic strategies. Finally, we outline areas for future investigation, including high-resolution profiling of human sutures across developmental stages, to establish a normative framework for cranial suture biology and inform mechanism-driven regenerative approaches.

Indexed as

Cranial SuturesCraniosynostosesOsteogenesisAnimalsHumansSignal Transductionbone formationcranial developmentcranial suture biologycraniosynostosisossification mechanismsskull growthstem and progenitor cells

Identifiers

PMID41945928
PMCPMC13056385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.