ArticleNeural computation2026
Signal-Dependent Planning Noise Reduces Task Interference by Assisting in the Formation of Stable Motor Primitives in a Neural Network Model of Muscle Coordination Learning.
Article in Neural computation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In human motor coordination, learning to coactivate multiple muscles at once to achieve distinct target combinations of forces or tasks remains a fundamental area of study. Task interference, where training on one task degrades performance on previously learned tasks, can slow motor learning. However, the neural mechanisms that reduce interference are not fully understood. We hypothesized that the structure of planning noise, specifically its signal-dependent nature, significantly shapes learning dynamics and limits interference within motor learning systems that rely on variability for exploration. To test this hypothesis, we developed a three-layer neural network model of muscle coordination informed by key neuroanatomical and neurophysiological principles and simulated learning for producing various combinations of muscle forces. Synaptic weights were stochastically altered from trial to trial with either fixed-variance planning noise (FVPN), where each connection's variance was fixed during learning, or signal-dependent planning noise (SDPN), where noise variance depended on the neuron population activity. Weights were reinforced when they reduced output error relative to target forces. An execution noise term, applied to the motor output, modeled peripheral motor variability. However, the learning rule was not informed about how much of the output corresponded to peripheral or central variability. Our results showed that SDPN improved both the rate and accuracy of multitask learning by reducing task interference compared to FVPN across network sizes, training schedules, and execution noise levels. SDPN achieved this by concentrating neural plasticity within the neuron populations engaged by the current task rather than modifying the entire network. This signal-dependent plasticity allowed multiple motor primitives to form, stabilize, and be reused for new tasks. The model replicated the well-documented benefit of interleaved versus blocked training in motor learning. As a computational proof of concept, this work suggests that SDPN can benefit multitask motor training by facilitating the formation of motor primitives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.