Trial reportHepatology (Baltimore, Md.)2026
A randomized, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial of pradefovir mesylate versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B.
Trial report in Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pradefovir mesylate and tenofovir amibufenamide for chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and pragmatic treatment algorithm.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
71 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsPradefovir mesylate is a novel liver-targeting prodrug of adefovir developed using HepDirect technology. We report that the phase 3 trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of pradefovir versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). APPROACH AND
resultsThis ongoing randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority, phase 3 study was conducted at 58 sites in China. Patients with CHB were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either 45 mg daily pradefovir or 300 mg daily TDF with a matching placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was defined as the proportion of patients whose HBV DNA level was <29 IU/mL at week 48. All participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug were included in efficacy and safety analyses with pre-specified renal and bone endpoints at week 96. A total of 1170 patients were screened during the study, and 908 patients received the study drug. At week 48, viral suppression (HBV DNA <29 IU/mL) rates of pradefovir were non-inferior to TDF in HBeAg-positive [-1.8% (95% CI: -9.7 to 6.1)] and HBeAg-negative [2.6% (95% CI: -5.1 to 10.3)] patients, using a non-inferiority margin of -12%. By week 96, HBeAg-positive patients showed significantly greater HBsAg decline (≥1 log 10 IU/mL) with pradefovir (39.3% vs. 29.9%). Pradefovir demonstrated a more favorable safety profile at week 96, including significantly fewer drug-related adverse events (58.6% vs. 71.9%), improved bone/renal safety, and a lower incidence of elevated creatine phosphokinase-MB.
conclusionsPradefovir should be a highly recommended treatment option for adult patients with CHB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.