ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2026
The Emergence of a Universal Rhythmic Feature: Simple Models Can Produce Categorical Rhythms.
Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cortico-striatal network architecture shapes rhythmic biases in music.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Across musical cultures, rhythm consists of discrete categories of interval durations. Such rhythmic categories are also increasingly quantified in various nonhuman species' displays. However, their evolutionary origins are still largely unknown. Complementing cross-species comparative work with computational modeling can help us understand the cognitive mechanisms underlying the emergence of this universal rhythmic feature and the minimum requirements for producing it. This study investigates whether minimal computational models can produce rhythmic categories. We compare two computational models: a single spiking neuron model representing a minimal neural system, and a model of cricket stridulation as a minimal synchronization mechanism. Both models transform a random temporal sequence into a more structured, isochronous rhythm; that is, randomly distributed temporal intervals get more similar in duration. An isochronous input sequence, in contrast, combined with the models' intrinsic bias, has a more complex effect on the produced temporal patterns. At frequencies that closely relate to the models' intrinsic frequency, the models produce stable temporal patterns with rhythmic categories. Our results show that rhythmic categories can emerge from simple mechanisms, likely shared across species, especially when multiple individually isochronous mechanisms interact. As such, we should expect to find categorical rhythms across an even larger range of animal displays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.