ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2026
Top-Down Attention Modulates Phase Effects on Audio-Tactile Processing.
Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multisensory processing is necessary in our daily lives, which is modulated by the temporal alignment of multiple sensory inputs. However, it remains poorly understood if and how selective attention interacts with this temporal alignment to further modulate audio-tactile processing. This study aimed to explore how selective attention and temporal alignment influence cortical responses to rhythmic audio-tactile streams. Participants were exposed to periodic auditory tones embedded in continuous background noise, either presented alone or paired with fluctuating tactile stimulation that was either in-phase or anti-phase with the tones. Selective attention was manipulated by instructing participants to perform an auditory detection task focusing on either the tones or the background noise. Electroencephalography recordings revealed that anti-phase audio-tactile inputs, compared to auditory-only inputs, elicited enhanced cortical steady-state responses and phase-locking to the tones. Importantly, this effect was further enhanced when participants paid attention to the tone, potentially reflecting the resolution of sensory competition among the simultaneous auditory and tactile inputs. In-phase tactile inputs elicited nonsignificant increases in tone processing regardless of attention. In sum, these findings underscore the dynamic interplay between bottom-up temporal alignment and top-down attentional modulations in audio-tactile processing, providing insights into how the brain integrates audio-tactile information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.