ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
Modeling spatial contrast sensitivity in responses of primate retinal ganglion cells to natural movies.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contrast Sensitivity Impairment in Diabetic Retinopathy: Clinical and Structural Correlates.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Inhibition benefits neural system identification.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Learning to cluster neuronal function.ArXiv · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retinal ganglion cells, the output neurons of the vertebrate retina, often display nonlinear summation of visual signals over their receptive fields. This creates sensitivity to spatial contrast, letting the cells respond to spatially structured visual stimuli even when no net change in overall illumination of the receptive field occurs. Yet, computational models of ganglion cell responses are often based on linear receptive fields, and typical nonlinear extensions, which separate receptive fields into nonlinearly combined subunits, are often cumbersome to fit to experimental data. Previous work has suggested to model spatial-contrast sensitivity in responses to flashed images by combining signals from the mean and variance of light intensity inside the receptive field. Here, we extend and adjust this spatial contrast model for application to spatiotemporal stimulation and explore its performance on spiking responses that we recorded from ganglion cells of marmosets under artificial and naturalistic movies. We show how the model can be fitted to experimental data and that it outperforms common models with linear spatial integration to different degrees for different types of ganglion cells. Finally, we use the model framework to infer the cells' spatial scale of nonlinear spatial integration. Our work shows that the spatial contrast model can capture aspects of nonlinear spatial integration in the primate retina with only few free parameters. The model can be used to assess the cells' functional properties under natural stimulation and provides a simple-to-obtain benchmark for comparison with more detailed nonlinear encoding models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.