Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41945609›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

Modeling spatial contrast sensitivity in responses of primate retinal ganglion cells to natural movies.

Shashwat Sridhar, Michaela Vystrčilová, Mohammad H Khani, Dimokratis Karamanlis, Helene M Schreyer, Varsha Ramakrishna, Steffen Krüppel, Sören J Zapp, Matthias Mietsch, Alexander S Ecker and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Inhibition benefits neural system identification.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shashwat SridharDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8837-8555
Michaela VystrčilováUniversity of Göttingen, Institute of Computer Science and Campus Institute Data Science, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0276-1078
Mohammad H KhaniDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3123-7054
Dimokratis KaramanlisDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9469-5020
Helene M SchreyerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0279-3387
Varsha RamakrishnaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1369-2600
Steffen KrüppelDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2773-6785
Sören J ZappDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0836-1663
Matthias MietschGerman Primate Center, Laboratory Animal Science Unit, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3520-5394
Alexander S EckerBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2392-5105
Tim GollischDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3998-533X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinal ganglion cells, the output neurons of the vertebrate retina, often display nonlinear summation of visual signals over their receptive fields. This creates sensitivity to spatial contrast, letting the cells respond to spatially structured visual stimuli even when no net change in overall illumination of the receptive field occurs. Yet, computational models of ganglion cell responses are often based on linear receptive fields, and typical nonlinear extensions, which separate receptive fields into nonlinearly combined subunits, are often cumbersome to fit to experimental data. Previous work has suggested to model spatial-contrast sensitivity in responses to flashed images by combining signals from the mean and variance of light intensity inside the receptive field. Here, we extend and adjust this spatial contrast model for application to spatiotemporal stimulation and explore its performance on spiking responses that we recorded from ganglion cells of marmosets under artificial and naturalistic movies. We show how the model can be fitted to experimental data and that it outperforms common models with linear spatial integration to different degrees for different types of ganglion cells. Finally, we use the model framework to infer the cells' spatial scale of nonlinear spatial integration. Our work shows that the spatial contrast model can capture aspects of nonlinear spatial integration in the primate retina with only few free parameters. The model can be used to assess the cells' functional properties under natural stimulation and provides a simple-to-obtain benchmark for comparison with more detailed nonlinear encoding models.

Indexed as

Contrast SensitivityModels, NeurologicalRetinal Ganglion CellsAnimalsCallithrixComputational BiologyComputer SimulationPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41945609
PMCPMC13099094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.