ReviewEFORT open reviews2026
Methods of nerve mapping to prevent iatrogenic nerve injuries during ankle arthroscopy: scoping review.
Review in EFORT open reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To synthesise the literature on pre- and intra-operative nerve mapping used to prevent iatrogenic nerve injuries during ankle arthroscopy. This scoping review followed the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. A systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE and Embase on 24 July 2024. Findings extracted from eligible studies were tabulated and synthesised. The search identified 270 articles, of which 9 met inclusion/exclusion criteria and were included in the review. Two studies described a mapping technique without reporting any outcomes, and three studies evaluated mapping techniques on cadavers and four on live patients. Four studies reported on visualisation and/or palpation, one study on arthroscopic transillumination, three on ultrasound and two on near-infrared light (NIR). There were only two comparative studies that showed that pre-operative ultrasound mapping places the nerves at safer distances from the portals and that ultrasound is more effective in the identification of the superficial peroneal nerve (SPN) than visualisation and/or palpation. Visualisation and/or palpation of the SPN is the most effective in ankle maximal plantar flexion and inversion and reduces the risk of nerve injury. There was no saphenous nerve injury with percutaneous screw insertion while using NIR. A reduction in nerve injuries during ankle arthroscopy might be achievable by using pre- or intra-operative nerve mapping with visualisation and/or palpation, ultrasound or (for nerves accompanied by the veins) NIR. The limited evidence suggests that pre-operative ultrasound might be potentially the most effective mapping method, but more comparative and prospective studies are needed to fully confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.