Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41945575›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2026

Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis: current perspectives on diagnosis, imaging, and treatment.

Bechara El Khoury, Ahmad Assi, Mohamad Farhat, Marc Boutros, Amer Sebaaly

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bechara El Khoury
Mohamad Farhat
Marc Boutros
Amer Sebaaly

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Congenital lumbar stenosis (CLS) is an uncommon disorder marked by a congenitally small spinal canal, which frequently results in early-onset neurogenic symptoms. Sarpyener originally characterized CLS in 1947, and Verbiest later offered a clinical description of lumbar spinal stenosis that did not recognize the congenital nature of the condition. The frequency of absolute CLS is believed to be 2.6%; however, data are lacking. This narrative review will outline current knowledge on CLS, including its prevalence, clinical presentation, genetic implications, aspects in diagnostic imaging for the condition, and treatment options. CLS has similar clinical characteristics to acquired lumbar stenosis; however, individuals with CLS report more severe leg and back pain. Genetic factors may contribute to CLS occurrence; however, research on this aspect is scarce. CLS is usually related to cervical and thoracic stenosis, as well as diseases such disk herniation and spondylolisthesis. The diagnosis is based on imaging criteria, which are continually being refined. The treatment options vary from conservative care to surgical treatments, such as laminoplasty and stability-preserving decompression, although long-term outcome data are limited. CLS poses distinct diagnostic and treatment challenges given its early onset. Further study is needed to provide uniform diagnostic criteria, evaluate long-term treatment results, and identify specific genetic factors that contribute to CLS.

Indexed as

congenital lumbar spinal stenosisdifferential diagnosislumbar vertebraespinal canalspinal stenosis

Identifiers

PMID41945575
PMCPMC13087876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.