ArticlePloS one2026
Perceptions of factors influencing Ebola vaccine acceptance among community members, healthcare workers, and response personnel in Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe 2018-2020 Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreak in Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) occurred amid armed conflict, institutional mistrust, and fragile health systems. The Ebola vaccine was deployed under emergency pre-licensure use, and concerns about it persisted. This study explored community and healthcare worker (HCW) perceptions of the Ebola vaccine to better understand the sociocultural and structural drivers of vaccine acceptance.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative study in three heavily affected health zones in North Kivu province (Beni, Butembo, and Mabalako) in 2021. Data were collected through thirty-three focus group discussions and 15 key informant interviews with EVD survivors, community members, HCWs, and local leaders, purposively sampled to capture diverse perspectives. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic and content analysis.
resultsParticipants reported concerns about the safety of the vaccine, mistrust in the institutions delivering it, and confusion due to rumors and inconsistent communication from the Ebola response. HCWs reported feeling coerced into vaccination rather than making a voluntary choice. Misinformation, logistical barriers, and perceptions of favoritism and stigmatization linked to ring vaccination were cited as preventing acceptance. Religion played a dual role, both fostering skepticism and encouraging acceptance depending on the stance of local faith leaders. Participants emphasized the need for transparent and balanced communication, equitable access, and greater involvement of trusted and competent community figures in vaccination efforts.
conclusionsEbola vaccine decision-making in Eastern DRC was shaped by complex interactions between institutional mistrust, perceived risk, religion, and access constraints within a broader context of sociopolitical instability. This study provides a critical baseline of perceptions during the vaccine's pre-licensure phase and highlights the importance of locally grounded engagement strategies. As vaccines become licensed, understanding local perceptions as well as leveraging the influence of trusted religious and community leaders will be essential for improving vaccine uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.