Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41945551›Full record

SynthesisEFORT open reviews2026

Artificial intelligence in the diagnostic imaging of developmental dysplasia of the hip: a systematic review.

Abith Ganesh Kamath, Saran Singh Gill, Hussayn Shinwari, Kapil Sugand

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in EFORT open reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abith Ganesh KamathFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4830-1969
Saran Singh GillFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8544-8327
Hussayn ShinwariFaculty of Medicine, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8775-3490
Kapil SugandFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: With the increased challenges in diagnosing DDH using traditional ultrasound imaging methods, accurate diagnosis is essential. This study assesses the effectiveness of AI in the imaging-based diagnosis of DDH through a systematic review. Methods: This review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and registered in Prospero (registration ID: CRD42024563606). A comprehensive search was conducted across Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Studies were screened using selection criteria, and quality was assessed using standardised tools. Thematic content analysis was also performed. Of the 32 studies identified, 19 were included, with 15 undergoing quantitative analysis. The main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, AUROC, PPV, and NPV. Median, median absolute deviation, Bonett-Price 95% confidence intervals, maximum, minimum, and interquartile ranges were calculated and presented in a box-and-whisker diagram. Results: In the 19 included studies, the median sensitivity was 90.0% and specificity was 93.2% across 36,907 patients. Fifteen studies reported diagnostic accuracy, with a median of 92.6%. Accuracy rates ranged from 79.2 to 99%. The most common model architecture was mask R-CNN. Four studies (21%) were judged to have a high risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. Conclusions: AI technologies hold significant potential for enhancing the diagnostic accuracy of DDH. However, existing variability and bias across studies highlight the need for further standardisation and validation.

Indexed as

accuracyartificial intelligencecongenital dysplasia of hipdevelopmental dysplasia of hipimagingpredictive valueradiographysensitivityspecificityultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID41945551
PMCPMC13087869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.