ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2026
ADC Target Profiling in NSCLC: Generalizable AI Separates TROP-2 and cMET Phenotypes.
Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAntibody-drug conjugates (ADC) targeting trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (TROP-2) and cMET are entering clinical trials in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Their translation depends on reliable biomarker assessment, a task still dominated by subjective visual scoring and inconsistent reproducibility. EXPERIMENTAL
designWe built a modular Artificial Intelligence (AI) pipeline that detects cells, classifies carcinoma cells, and quantifies membranous and cytoplasmic expression. A membranous scorer trained on TROP-2 was applied zero-shot to cMET, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and PD-L1. For TROP-2, cMET, and HER2, expression was quantified using the H-score, defined as (1× % weakly positive cells) + (2× % moderately positive cells) + (3× % strongly positive cells), with negative cells excluded (range, 0-300), and categorized as negative (0-50), weakly positive (50-100), moderately positive (100-200), or strongly positive (200-300). PD-L1 expression was assessed using both the H-score and the tumor proportion score (TPS), defined as the percentage of viable tumor cells showing membranous PD-L1 staining relative to all viable tumor cells, multiplied by 100. The analysis covered 1,142 resected NSCLCs, integrating expression maps with clinicopathologic, molecular, and tumor microenvironment (TME) features.
resultsThe AI scorer recapitulated pathologist annotations with near-perfect correlation [Pearsons's correlation (r) = 0.98-0.99, Spearman's rho (ρ) = 97-98, Kendall's tau (τ) = 0.88-0.89, Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) = 0.97-0.98] for TROP-2 and generalized to other markers [cMET r = 0.99, ρ = 0.96, τ = 0.91, CCC = 0.96; HER2 r = 0.93, ρ = 0.72, τ = 0.60, CCC = 0.92; and PD-L1 (TPS) r = 0.85, ρ = 0.84, τ = 0.68, CCC = 0.82/(H-score) r = 0.87, ρ = 0.86, τ = 0.70, CCC = 0.85]. Its agreement with six pathologists matched interobserver variability (0.86-0.96). Expression maps revealed contrasting spatial and cellular patterns: TROP-2 dominated lung squamous cell carcinoma [LUSC; mean H-Scores 141.3/103.2 vs. 74.5/45.7 in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) for membrane/cytoplasm] and marked immune-deserted tumors. cMET prevailed in LUAD (mean 50.4 vs. 20.6 in LUSC), colocalized with fibroblast-rich, immune-active TME, and KRAS mutations.
conclusionsFoundation model-based scoring produces expert-level, scalable biomarker quantification. The resulting TME phenotypes-TROP-2-high immune-deserted versus cMET-high, immune-active-reveal therapeutic implications for combining ADCs with immunotherapies or kinase inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.