Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41945429›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Chemputer and chemputation-A universal chemical compound synthesis machine.

Leroy Cronin, Sebastian Pagel, Abhishek Sharma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leroy CroninSchool of Chemistry, Advanced Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G11 6EW, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8035-5757
Sebastian PagelSchool of Chemistry, Advanced Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G11 6EW, United Kingdom.
Abhishek SharmaSchool of Chemistry, Advanced Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G11 6EW, United Kingdom.

Funding

UKRI | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (SRC) EP/L023652/1 EP/R01308X/1 EP/S019472/1 EP/P00153X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemputation treats chemical synthesis as the execution of reaction code on programmable hardware. We show that a Chemputer, equipped with an extensible set of reagents, catalysts, and process conditions, together with a compiler that maps reaction and hardware graphs, is universal. This means it can produce any stable, isolable molecule in finite time and detectable quantity, provided real-time error correction maintains sufficient step fidelity relative to the number of steps in the synthesis. We formalize this into a Chemical Synthesis Turing Machine (CSTM), which defines chemical execution through a unified description of reagents, process variables, and catalysts. The framework introduces the Universal Chemputation Principle and a dynamic error-correction scheme that enables fault-tolerant synthesis. Linking this framework to assembly theory strengthens the definition of a molecule by demanding practical synthesizability and error correction becomes a prerequisite for universality. We demonstrate the abstraction is universal with more than 100 χDL programs executed on modular Chemputers, from single-step reactions to multistep syntheses. In each case, the number of unit operations scales linearly with synthetic depth. These results establish programmable chemical synthesis, chemputation, as a subset of general computation where χDL programs are compiled to hardware, executed with closed-loop control, and yield verifiable molecular outputs. This formalization enables shareable chemical code, interoperable hardware, and a machine-verifiable, executable foundation for a searchable and formally provable map of chemical space.

Indexed as

chemical synthesischemputationchemputercomputer scienceuniversality

Identifiers

PMID41945429
PMCPMC13080024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.