ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Chemputer and chemputation-A universal chemical compound synthesis machine.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chemputation treats chemical synthesis as the execution of reaction code on programmable hardware. We show that a Chemputer, equipped with an extensible set of reagents, catalysts, and process conditions, together with a compiler that maps reaction and hardware graphs, is universal. This means it can produce any stable, isolable molecule in finite time and detectable quantity, provided real-time error correction maintains sufficient step fidelity relative to the number of steps in the synthesis. We formalize this into a Chemical Synthesis Turing Machine (CSTM), which defines chemical execution through a unified description of reagents, process variables, and catalysts. The framework introduces the Universal Chemputation Principle and a dynamic error-correction scheme that enables fault-tolerant synthesis. Linking this framework to assembly theory strengthens the definition of a molecule by demanding practical synthesizability and error correction becomes a prerequisite for universality. We demonstrate the abstraction is universal with more than 100 χDL programs executed on modular Chemputers, from single-step reactions to multistep syntheses. In each case, the number of unit operations scales linearly with synthetic depth. These results establish programmable chemical synthesis, chemputation, as a subset of general computation where χDL programs are compiled to hardware, executed with closed-loop control, and yield verifiable molecular outputs. This formalization enables shareable chemical code, interoperable hardware, and a machine-verifiable, executable foundation for a searchable and formally provable map of chemical space.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.