ReviewActa crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology2026
Electrons and X-rays for diffraction and imaging.
Review in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A comparison is provided between the use of electrons and X-rays for collecting diffraction data from small protein crystals and imaging data from cells and tissues. The paper contains a review element written to enable an understanding of the relevant properties of electrons by those (including one of the authors) more used to X-ray imaging and diffraction. Radiation-damage mechanisms, sample thickness-dependent dose efficiency and energy-dependent scattering cross sections are discussed, together with contrast mechanisms in electron and X-ray imaging. Crossover points are calculated for diffraction from crystals where electrons and X-rays could yield equivalent data quality in the presence of radiation damage. Increasing the electron energy from 300 to 1000 keV results in a ∼43% rise in the electron/X-ray crossover point. However, the maximum information coefficient (useful signal/absorbed dose) for electrons alone occurs for a 250 nm crystal examined at around 800 keV. The impact of inelastic scattering on electron imaging and diffraction is examined, including its role in coherence loss, Bragg spot broadening and background elevation. The possibilities are investigated for locating regions of interest using X-rays for subsequent higher resolution imaging using electrons. For locating a 30 nm diameter protein or virus, the required X-ray dose would be much less than the tolerable dose for electron imaging at 0.5 or 0.25 nm. Overall, these findings are relevant for imaging at different length scales while minimizing dose-induced structural damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.