SynthesisAdministration and policy in mental health2026
A Systematic Review of Built Environment Interventions to Improve Patient and Staff Outcomes in Emergency Department Mental and Behavioral Healthcare.
Synthesis in Administration and policy in mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The built environment of Emergency Departments (EDs) provides the context and setting for care delivery, influences workflows, and shapes user interactions, but its noisy, sterile, stimulating nature can be counter-therapeutic to patients in psychiatric crises. As ED Mental and Behavioral Health (MBH) presentation rates rise, healthcare organizations and designers must develop strategies to address challenges and improve care. This systematic review analyzes emergency department-based built environment interventions implemented to improve the safety and experiences of patients seeking emergency MBH care and ED staff involved in their care. Our team searched six databases in March 2023 using PRISMA methods and the SEIPS 3.0 framework to identify and analyze nineteen studies of ED-based built environment interventions for MBH care. Interventions occurred at three scales - unit, room, and element - and impacted patient and staff outcomes. For example, MBH units located outside of the main ED contributed to decreases in length of stay, boarding, and inpatient psychiatric admissions. Room and element-scale interventions helped improve patient experiences and increase safety. This review summarizes existing knowledge surrounding built environment interventions for emergency MBH care and identifies opportunities for design and clinical practice applications. Future research is necessary to capture patient and staff voices, examine various types of EDs, and compare interventions across hospitals. This review shows how physical interventions in the built environment of EDs - from individual elements to entire units - can improve processes, safety, and experiences for MBH patients and staff, especially when incorporated into broader, systems-based changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.