ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
A Retrospective Examination of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Metachronous Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Prior to CRS/HIPEC.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) prior to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (HIPEC) for patients with metachronous colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM) carries theoretical advantages but thus far has not demonstrated survival benefit.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective single institution study of patients with CRPM undergoing CRS/HIPEC ± NACT from 2002 to 2022.
resultsA total of 199 patients with metachronous CRPM were identified; 128 patients (64.3%) underwent NACT while 71 patients (35.7%) underwent upfront CRS/HIPEC. The majority of patients were white (92.5%) and male (53.3%) with a median age of 57 years. There was an average of 19.5 months from initial colon cancer diagnosis to the development of CRPM, and 155 patients (77.9%) had undergone previous systemic chemotherapy in their disease course prior to development of CRPM. Patients who received NACT demonstrated no difference in PCI (median 12 vs. 10, p = .19) or rate of undergoing complete cytoreduction (81.2% vs. 93%, p = .08) versus those who underwent upfront CRS/HIPEC. Patients undergoing NACT+CRS/HIPEC experienced a significantly higher rate of major perioperative complications (25% vs. 12.7%, p = .04) and increased hospital length of stay (12 vs. 10 days, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in median recurrence-free survival (18.7 vs. 20.3 months, p = .283) or overall survival (35.3 vs. 32.9 months, p = .513) between the groups.
conclusionsUtilizing NACT prior to CRS/HIPEC for patients with metachronous CRPM did not demonstrate survival benefit. NACT was, however, associated with increased rates of perioperative complications and length of hospital stay. Further studies are needed to better evaluate the optimal role and timing of systemic chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41945300What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.