ArticleFood science of animal resources2026
Extraction and characterization of biomaterials from pork bones: a potential alternative of pineapple by-product extract for commercial proteases.
Article in Food science of animal resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop cost-effective methods for extracting biomaterials from pork bones. Collagen and chondroitin sulfate (CS) were extracted from pork bones using a pineapple by-product extract (PE) at 5% (v/w) or commercial proteases (pepsin and Alcalase) under identical conditions. The use of PE resulted in a higher collagen yield than pepsin (3.77% vs. 1.42%). The CS concentration extracted with PE was comparable to that obtained using Alcalase (11.98 mg/g vs. 11.37 mg/g). Protein pattern analysis indicated that collagens extracted using either PE or pepsin were type I collagen. 1H NMR analysis showed that CS extracted using either PE or Alcalase contained both CS-C and CS-A units. Among 28 peptides identified, 7 peptides (Gly-Arg, Glu-Gly-Arg, Ala-Val-Gly, Leu-Ala, Leu-Val-Gly, Phe-Ala-Gly-Gly, and Gly-Pro-Leu-Gly-Pro-Hyp-Gly-Ala-Pro-Gly) and 4 peptides (Leu-Pro, Leu-Thr-Gly, Gly-Pro-Leu-Gly-Pro-Hyp-Gly-Ala-Pro-Gly, and Gly-Pro-Ala-Gly-Pro-Val-Gly-Pro-Val-Gly) were found only in the collagen extracted with pepsin and PE, respectively. Notably, peptide hydrolysates derived from PE-extracted collagen exhibited higher free radical scavenging and ferrous ion-chelating activities than those obtained from pepsin-extracted collagen. Overall, PE emerges as a cost-effective and efficient alternative to commercial enzymes for extracting biomaterials from pork bones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.