Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41945182›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2026

The work-flow of three-dimensional visualization of extended endoscopic endonasal approaches using frame extraction.

Aysu İyigün Kabakcı, Beste Gülsuna, Gökberk Erol, Yunus Emre Özbilgi, Sergio Augusto Barbosa de Farias, Elena Rosellini, Guilherme Finger, Gabriel Vargas Rosales, Christopher S Graffeo, Abuzer Güngör and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Aysu İyigün KabakcıDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurosciences Institute, Indiana University, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA.
Beste GülsunaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Gökberk ErolDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurosciences Institute, Indiana University, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA.
Yunus Emre ÖzbilgiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medeniyet University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Sergio Augusto Barbosa de FariasDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurosciences Institute, Indiana University, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA.
Elena RoselliniDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurosciences Institute, Indiana University, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA.
Guilherme FingerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurosciences Institute, Indiana University, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA.
Gabriel Vargas RosalesDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurosciences Institute, Indiana University, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA.
Christopher S GraffeoDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Abuzer GüngörDepartment of Neurosurgery, İstinye University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Joao Paulo AlmeidaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurosciences Institute, Indiana University, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA. joalmeid@iu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) to the skull base have revolutionized neurosurgical access, however, as the spectrum of extended EEAs continues to expand, traditional two-dimensional imaging remains insufficient for comprehensive anatomical understanding. Three-dimensional (3D) photorealistic models derived from endoscopic video recordings of extended EEAs, offer immersive visualization for education. The objective of the study is to describe a standardized step-by-step workflow for generating 3D models from endoscopic endonasal cadaveric dissections. EEAs were performed to the sellar, parasellar region, cavernous sinus, medial wall of orbit, pterygoid fossa, and jugular foramen on cadaveric heads, and the final anatomical exposures obtained through these dissections were subsequently captured and reconstructed in 3D using this standardized workflow. Five embalmed human cadaveric heads underwent stepwise EEAs at Microneurosurgery Skull Base Laboratory at Indiana University. Videos were recorded using both 0 and 30 degree endoscopes, with systematic frame extraction via FFmpeg, post-processing in Adobe Photoshop, and 3D reconstruction in Agisoft Metashape. Models were hosted on Sketchfab for interactive viewing. Photorealistic, life-size 3D models were produced with millions of polygons, preserving anatomical textures and geometry. Offline and online visualizations enable scalable applications without resolution loss. This workflow provides a reproducible framework that can be adopted by skull base laboratories, bridging endoscopy and 3D modeling, enhancing skull base education and simulation. Future integration with AI-driven segmentation could further automate labeling and analysis.

Indexed as

EndoscopyImaging, Three-DimensionalNasal CavityNeuroendoscopySkull BaseCadaverHumansModels, Anatomic3D reconstructionEndoscopic endonasal approachPhotogrammetrySkull base anatomySurgical simulationVideogrammetry

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.