ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
The work-flow of three-dimensional visualization of extended endoscopic endonasal approaches using frame extraction.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) to the skull base have revolutionized neurosurgical access, however, as the spectrum of extended EEAs continues to expand, traditional two-dimensional imaging remains insufficient for comprehensive anatomical understanding. Three-dimensional (3D) photorealistic models derived from endoscopic video recordings of extended EEAs, offer immersive visualization for education. The objective of the study is to describe a standardized step-by-step workflow for generating 3D models from endoscopic endonasal cadaveric dissections. EEAs were performed to the sellar, parasellar region, cavernous sinus, medial wall of orbit, pterygoid fossa, and jugular foramen on cadaveric heads, and the final anatomical exposures obtained through these dissections were subsequently captured and reconstructed in 3D using this standardized workflow. Five embalmed human cadaveric heads underwent stepwise EEAs at Microneurosurgery Skull Base Laboratory at Indiana University. Videos were recorded using both 0 and 30 degree endoscopes, with systematic frame extraction via FFmpeg, post-processing in Adobe Photoshop, and 3D reconstruction in Agisoft Metashape. Models were hosted on Sketchfab for interactive viewing. Photorealistic, life-size 3D models were produced with millions of polygons, preserving anatomical textures and geometry. Offline and online visualizations enable scalable applications without resolution loss. This workflow provides a reproducible framework that can be adopted by skull base laboratories, bridging endoscopy and 3D modeling, enhancing skull base education and simulation. Future integration with AI-driven segmentation could further automate labeling and analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41945182What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.