Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41945170›Full record

ArticleOecologia2026

Effects of population density on life history traits in a moth: in search of proximate and ultimate explanations.

Kerli Kuusk, Toomas Esperk, Tiit Teder, Sille Holm, Toomas Tammaru

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kerli KuuskDepartment of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, J. Liivi 2, EE-50409, Tartu, Estonia. kerli.kuusk.1@ut.ee.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-9681-076X
Toomas EsperkDepartment of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, J. Liivi 2, EE-50409, Tartu, Estonia.
Tiit TederDepartment of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, J. Liivi 2, EE-50409, Tartu, Estonia.
Sille HolmDepartment of Ecology, Faculty of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Toomas TammaruDepartment of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, J. Liivi 2, EE-50409, Tartu, Estonia.

Funding

Eesti Teadusagentuur PRG2618Eesti Teadusagentuur PRG741Internal Grant Agency of the Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague 42900/1312/3141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population density often modifies the phenotypes of the members of the population. Such density-dependent phenotypic plasticity can affect basic life history traits of the organisms. In insects, a frequently observed expression of such plasticity is the crowding response (CR), where individuals growing at high densities develop faster and attain lower final sizes compared to those at low densities. This plastic change qualitatively differs from the general stress response where lower final sizes are associated with longer development periods. The adaptive significance of CR, as well as the nature of the cues that trigger CR, remains poorly understood. We performed a series of experiments to identify proximate signals leading to CR in the geometrid moth Hypomecis atomaria, a species in which larvae reared in groups consistently pupate earlier and at lower weights than those reared in isolation. Our findings reveal that CR is also induced in complete darkness, suggesting that visual cues of high population densities do not play a decisive role. CR was triggered when the larvae were separated by a mesh barrier, preventing tactile interaction between them. The presence of heterospecific lepidopteran larvae also triggered CR, though to varying degrees. By contrast, neither the presence of dipteran insects in the rearing environment nor human-inflicted tactile stimulation affected the growth schedules of H. atomaria larvae. We conclude that CR is likely induced either by chemical signals or substrate-borne vibrations caused by other larvae. In any case, CR is not a highly specific response to high densities of conspecifics, nor is it a very general reaction to unspecific disturbances. This allows us to narrow down the set of potential adaptive explanations for the phenomenon.

Indexed as

Life History TraitsMothsAnimalsLarvaPopulation DensityAggregationCompetitionDensity dependenceEmaturga atomariaLarval density

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.