ArticleOecologia2026
Effects of population density on life history traits in a moth: in search of proximate and ultimate explanations.
Article in Oecologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Population density often modifies the phenotypes of the members of the population. Such density-dependent phenotypic plasticity can affect basic life history traits of the organisms. In insects, a frequently observed expression of such plasticity is the crowding response (CR), where individuals growing at high densities develop faster and attain lower final sizes compared to those at low densities. This plastic change qualitatively differs from the general stress response where lower final sizes are associated with longer development periods. The adaptive significance of CR, as well as the nature of the cues that trigger CR, remains poorly understood. We performed a series of experiments to identify proximate signals leading to CR in the geometrid moth Hypomecis atomaria, a species in which larvae reared in groups consistently pupate earlier and at lower weights than those reared in isolation. Our findings reveal that CR is also induced in complete darkness, suggesting that visual cues of high population densities do not play a decisive role. CR was triggered when the larvae were separated by a mesh barrier, preventing tactile interaction between them. The presence of heterospecific lepidopteran larvae also triggered CR, though to varying degrees. By contrast, neither the presence of dipteran insects in the rearing environment nor human-inflicted tactile stimulation affected the growth schedules of H. atomaria larvae. We conclude that CR is likely induced either by chemical signals or substrate-borne vibrations caused by other larvae. In any case, CR is not a highly specific response to high densities of conspecifics, nor is it a very general reaction to unspecific disturbances. This allows us to narrow down the set of potential adaptive explanations for the phenomenon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41945170What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.