SynthesisArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2026
Misdiagnosis of different types of aneuploidy in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT): a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeRecent studies have reported that embryos diagnosed as aneuploid by preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) can still result in successful live births after transfer. This suggests that, in addition to mosaic embryos, fully aneuploid embryos may also carry a risk of diagnostic error, potentially reducing the overall accuracy of PGT. Therefore, thoroughly investigating the risk and characteristics of aneuploidy misdiagnosis is crucial for optimizing PGT strategies and improving clinical outcomes in assisted reproductive technology (ART).
methodsRelevant studies published from January 2000 to December 2024 were identified through PubMed and Web of Science. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). A diagnostic meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), combining sensitivity and specificity. Results were visualized using forest plots.
resultsA total of 22 studies were included to assess the discordance between trophectoderm (TE) biopsy and inner cell mass (ICM) or whole blastocyst (WB) results. The discordance rate for euploid embryo diagnosis was low (2.6%), whereas it was significantly higher for aneuploid embryos (9.2%). Segmental aneuploidies showed the highest discordance rate (17.4%). In the PGT-A population, misdiagnosis of segmental aneuploid embryos was particularly prominent (OR = 10.04, 95% CI: 7.60-13.27, I
conclusionThe results indicate that embryos with segmental aneuploidies have a significantly higher risk of misdiagnosis, especially in the PGT-A population. This highlights the need for caution when interpreting trophectoderm (TE) biopsy results involving segmental aneuploidies, to avoid misdiagnosis and the inadvertent discard of potentially viable embryos.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.