ArticlePsychological research2026
Ace in the hole: playing cards show the role of order and magnitude in the SNARC effect.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The SNARC effect indicates that numbers are mapped from left to right as in a mental number line. Accumulating evidence suggests that it could be attributed both to the magnitude or to the order of numbers, but the role of these two aspects has not yet been disambiguated since the two are tightly correlated. This study investigated the influence of order and magnitude in the SNARC effect using playing cards as stimuli. While most people organize cards in ascending order (AO), according to the Western reading-writing direction, a minority of people arrange them in descending order (DO). In this regard DO people should spontaneously associate low magnitude cards (e.g., 2) to the right, and high magnitude cards (e.g., 6) to the left. Therefore, in DO individuals, cards’ order would elicit a spatial mapping opposite to the canonical mapping of quantities (i.e., mental number line). In Experiment 1, DO participants performed magnitude classification on simple numerals and on playing cards, showing a regular SNARC effect when classifying numbers and no significant effect when classifying cards. Conversely, in Experiment 2, AO participants showed a regular SNARC effect when classifying both numbers and cards. In Experiment 3, a separate group of DO participants was recruited and tested online to replicate Experiment 1 and clarify the occurrence of spatial associations in card classification. Results indicated that DO participants showed regular SNARC effects both in number and card classification, suggesting that magnitude played a key role overruling the order of cards. This is apparently in contradiction with the view that specific experiences with ordered stimuli should determine the direction of an association.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.