ArticleArchives of virology2026
The emergence and evolutionary advantage of the novel epidemic norovirus GII.17 lineage.
Article in Archives of virology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human norovirus (HuNoV) is a major causative agent of non-bacterial gastroenteritis. During the winter of 2014/2015, the GII.17 Kawasaki variant emerged abruptly in Asia, temporarily surpassing the predominant GII.4 genotype and driving a significant epidemic surge. Since 2022, GII.17 has again caused sustained large-scale outbreaks due to the re-emerged of this genotype. To unravel the evolutionary advantages of these emerging GII.17 strains, we systematically evaluated the genetic variation mechanism of the GII.17 HuNoV capsid protein and their potential impact on viral prevalence. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the novel GII.17 lineages originated from the clade C of GII.17, with an amino acid distance of 2.6% from clade C. This lineage was provisionally designated as C2. Its time of most recent common ancestor was 2020, with an average evolutionary rate of 5.47 × 10− 3 substitutions/site/year. Amino acid multiple sequence alignment analysis revealed that there were no new insertions or deletions in the C2 compared with the earlier variant C. Through the prediction of positive selection sites and B-cell epitopes, it was determined that the prevalence of C2 might not be due to an increase in epitopes but might be due to mutations in existing epitopes. Among 12 key amino acid mutations, sites 297, 374, and 409 in the P2 domain were the key amino acid sites for the prevalence of the new GII.17 lineage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41945140What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.