ArticleInsights into imaging2026
Medical image pretraining-based transfer learning for generalizable and robust diagnosis of bone tumors on radiographs: a multi-center study.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo develop a generalizable and robust deep learning model for bone tumor classification in radiographs by leveraging domain-specific medical image pretraining. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective multi-center study included 2338 patients with histopathologically confirmed bone tumors from four centers. Four hundred seventy-one patients from one center were used for model development, and 1867 patients from the other three centers were used for the external test. Deep learning models (ResNet50 and InceptionV3) were developed using transfer learning with weights from either RadImageNet (medical images) or ImageNet (natural images). A radiomics model based on ElasticNet was also built. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), and the paired DeLong test was used to evaluate statistical significance between AUCs. Robustness was assessed through tumor bounding box perturbation experiments. Gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) was performed to localize the key area highlighted by the model for enhancing interpretability.
resultsResNet50 pretrained on RadImageNet demonstrated improved performance on external test sets (AUC = 0.738, 95% CI: 0.714-0.762), outperforming ImageNet-pretrained models (ResNet50: AUC = 0.669, 95% CI: 0.639-0.699, p < 0.001; InceptionV3: AUC = 0.677, 95% CI: 0.647-0.708, p < 0.001) and the radiomics model (AUC = 0.518, 95% CI: 0.487-0.548, p < 0.001). RadImageNet-pretrained models showed higher stability under tumor bounding box perturbation conditions (p < 0.001), and appropriately focused on diagnostically relevant regions in correctly classified cases.
conclusionThe deep learning model pretrained on domain-specific medical images demonstrated improved performance and robustness compared to the radiomics and natural image-pretrained models for bone tumor classification on radiographs. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Domain-specific medical image pretraining enhanced deep learning model performance and robustness over radiomics and natural image approaches in bone tumor classification on radiographs. KEY POINTS: Domain-specific medical image pretraining (RadImageNet) significantly outperforms natural image pretraining (ImageNet) for bone tumor classification on radiographs. Deep learning models pretrained on medical images demonstrate superior performance compared to radiomics approaches for bone tumor classification. AI assistance effectiveness varies among radiologists, with performance improvements depending on individual experience and receptiveness to AI support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.