ArticleBulletin of experimental biology and medicine2026
Composition of the Microbial Community of the Small Intestine of Rats under Conditions of Restraint Stress of Varying Duration.
Article in Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The composition of the microbial community of the small intestine of rats under chronic restraint stress of varying duration (14 and 28 days) was studied. Identification and quantitative determination of microorganisms were carried out using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry of microbial markers. It was found that under stress exposure, the number of Bifidobacterium spp., Lactobacillus spp., Enterococcus spp., Enterobacteriaceae spp., Actinomyces viscosus, Nocardia asteroides, Clostridium tetani, Clostridium ramosum decreased and the number of Clostridium difficile, Helicobacter pylori, Streptococcus mutans, Propionibacterium freudenreichii, Peptostreptococcus anaerobius increased. It was shown that enterococci are capable of self-restoring their population levels under stress conditions, whereas bifidobacteria, lactobacilli and enterobacteria do not exhibit adaptive capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41944944What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.