Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41944901›Full record

ArticleJournal of psycholinguistic research2026

The Role of Sensorimotor Strength in Understanding Chinese Concepts.

Dongcheng Xie, Jin Xue, Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dongcheng XieSchool of Foreign Studies, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China.
Jin XueSchool of Foreign Languages, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 102488, China. beijingxuejin@aliyun.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9737-4521
Fernando Marmolejo-RamosFlinders University, Adelaide, Australia.

Funding

Beijing Municipal Social Science Foundation 24YYB012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Sensorimotor experience plays a crucial role in the conceptual representation within our language system. Recently, numerous studies have explored the significance of perceptual and motor experiences in comprehending concepts across various languages. Methods To examine how sensorimotor experiences contribute to conceptual processing in Chinese, 137 native speakers of Chinese performed a rating task to evaluate the relevance of perceptual modalities and action effectors for a list of Chinese concepts. Results This study revealed correlations between perceptual modalities and action effectors. The sensorimotor grounding of Chinese concepts is organized into three functionally distinct domains, reflecting embodied semantic clusters. Specifically, the first domain encompasses dimensions related to the foot/leg, torso, hand/arm, visual, and haptic modalities. The second domain integrates the mouth/throat, gustatory, and olfactory dimensions. The third domain comprises dimensions related to the head, auditory, and interoceptive modalities. In Bayesian linear regression, the models for the hand/arm, gustatory, and head modalities demonstrate strong predictive capabilities within their respective domains. Discussion These findings show that conceptual representation in Chinese is systematically organized along distinct embodied sensorimotor domains. It provides further evidence for the embodiment of language processing in Chinese, thus reinforcing the notion that bodily experiences are integral to linguistic comprehension and representation.

Indexed as

ComprehensionConcept FormationLanguageAdultChinaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultChinese conceptsEmbodied cognitionMotor systemSensory system

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.