ArticleInternational journal of biometeorology2026
Designing for mild winters: evidence-based thermal comfort benchmarks from urban parks in a sub-tropical city.
Article in International journal of biometeorology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Outdoor thermal comfort in the cool season remains under-specified for humid subtropical cities. We conducted a winter field study across four urban parks in Hong Kong, collecting 611 paired questionnaire-microclimate records (December-March). On-site measurements (air temperature, globe temperature, humidity, wind) were linked at 60-s resolution to Cantonese surveys of thermal sensation. Neutral temperature was estimated with ordinary least squares and confirmed with proportional-odds models; 2,000-fold bootstrap confidence intervals and 0.5 °C binned regressions quantified uncertainty and sensitivity. Whole-sample neutral points were Air Temperature (Ta) 20.6 °C (95% CI 19.7–21.6 °C), Physiological Equivalent Temperature (PET) 23.7 °C (22.2–25.8 °C), and Universal Thermal Climate Index (UTCI) 20.7 °C (19.3–22.5 °C). Ta was the strongest single predictor of mean thermal sensation in binned fits (R² = 0.62), followed by UTCI (R² = 0.54) and PET (R²= 0.22). Females showed slightly steeper vote-temperature slopes but similar neutralities to males. Age had a clear effect: neutral UTCI rose from 18.6 °C (< 60 years) to 23.1 °C (> 75 years), with flatter slopes in older cohorts. Park type also mattered. Neutral PET and UTCI were about 2 °C warmer in larger, greener district parks than in compact street parks, consistent with higher sky-view and lower turbulence. Robustness checks (ordinal-logit, trimmed bins, meteorological filtering) shifted whole-sample neutralities by ≤ 0.4 °C. We propose UTCI 20–22 °C as a practical winter design target for subtropical parks, complemented by 2–3 °C warmer micro-niches for older users through solar access and wind shelter. These calibrated benchmarks support climate-responsive park design that sustains outdoor use through mild winters in ageing, high-density cities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.