ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Photon-counting CT characterization of carotid perivascular adipose tissue: a layer-by-layer quantitative analysis. A preliminary analysis in an asymptomatic population.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCarotid atherosclerosis is a major contributor to ischemic stroke. While luminal stenosis has historically guided treatment decisions, growing evidence indicates that plaque composition, vascular inflammation and perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT) may be more closely linked to clinical outcomes and plaque vulnerability. This study aimed to characterize carotid PVAT using photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) and to evaluate its spatial behavior and variability in a cohort of asymptomatic patients. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed PCCT angiography data from 20 asymptomatic patients. A custom-developed Python algorithm was used to segment concentric perivascular layers from 1 mm to 5 mm around the carotid artery. For each layer, we quantified attenuation values in Hounsfield Units (HU) and voxel counts. Statistical comparisons were performed across layers and between sides.
resultsMean PVAT attenuation decreased progressively with increasing distance from the carotid wall. Significant differences were observed between inner and outer layers, particularly between the 1 mm and 3-5 mm annuli. Circle-by-circle analysis revealed substantial inter-individual variability in HU trends. Voxel count increased with annular thickness, but variability (SD and CV) also rose in outer layers. No significant differences were found between left and right carotid arteries in either attenuation or voxel distribution.
conclusionPhoton-counting CT enables detailed, layer-specific assessment of carotid PVAT. The observed attenuation patterns and inter-individual variability suggest that PVAT profiling may provide valuable insights into local vascular inflammation and plaque vulnerability. These findings support the potential of PCCT as a noninvasive tool for vascular risk stratification beyond luminal stenosis. KEY POINTS: Question Can photon-counting CT enable a reliable, layer-by-layer quantitative characterization of carotid perivascular adipose tissue in asymptomatic patients beyond luminal stenosis assessment? Findings Photon-counting CT demonstrated a progressive decrease in PVAT attenuation with increasing distance from the carotid wall and marked inter-individual variability across concentric layers. Clinical relevance Layer-specific PVAT profiling with photon-counting CT may provide a noninvasive imaging marker of local vascular inflammation, supporting improved carotid risk stratification beyond stenosis severity, even in asymptomatic individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.